4.4 Article

Transport of terrestrial organic carbon to the oceans by rivers: re-estimating flux- and burial rates

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCES
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages 599-606

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s005310050290

Keywords

carbon cycle; terrestrial organic carbon; fluvial organic carbon discharge; organic carbon burial rate; organic carbon budget

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study re-estimates one important component in the global carbon cycle: the modern global fluviatile organic carbon discharge- and burial rates. According to these results, approximately 430 x 10(12) g of terrestrial organic carbon are transported to the ocean in modern times. This amount is higher than the latest estimates but takes into account new data from Oceania not previously considered in global flux studies. However, only the minor amount of 10% or approximately 43 x 10(12) gC year(-1) is most likely buried in marine sediments. This amount is similar to the burial of marine organic carbon in the coastal ocean (55 x 10(12) gC year(-1)), Adding both estimates gives approximately 100 x 10(12) gC year(-1), which is the value calculated by Berner (1982) for terrestrial deltaic-shelf sediments. However, the results in this study suggest that on a global scale the organic carbon content in coastal ocean sediments is not solely of terrestrial origin but a mixture of nearly equal amounts of marine and terrestrial organic carbon. The major part of the terrestrial organic carbon that enters the ocean by rivers (approximately 400 x 10(12) gC year(-1)) seems to be either (a) remineralised in the ocean, whereas the mechanism by which the terrestrial organic carbon is oxidised in the ocean are unknown; or (b) is dispersed throughout the oceans and accumulates in pelagic sediments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available