4.3 Article

Statistical guidelines for studies of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behaviour

Journal

PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages 151-161

Publisher

HARWOOD ACAD PUBL GMBH
DOI: 10.1080/08870440008400297

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We identify potential problems in the statistical analysis of social cognition model data, with special emphasis on the theories of reasoned action (TRA) and planned behaviour (TPB). Some statistical guidelines are presented for empirical studies of the TRA and the TPB based upon multiple linear regression and structural equation modelling (SEM). If the model is tested using multiple regression, the assumptions of this technique must be considered and variables transformed if necessary. Adjusted R-2 (not R-2) should be used as a measure of explained variance and semipartial correlations are useful in assessing each component's unique contribution to explained variance. R-2 is not an indicator of model adequacy and residuals should be examined. Expectancy-value variables that are the product of expectancy and value measures represent the interaction term in a multiple regression and should not be used. SEM approaches make explicit the assumptions of unidimensionality of constructs in the TRA/TPB, assumptions that might usefully be challenged by competing models with multidimensional constructs. Finally, statistical power and sample size should be considered for both approaches. Inattention to any of these aspects of analysis threatens the validity of TRA/TPB research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available