4.2 Article

The effect of compacted cancellous bone grafting on the healing of subchondral bone defects of the medial femoral condyle in horses

Journal

VETERINARY SURGERY
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages 8-16

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2000.00008.x

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective-To compare the quality of second-intention healing and that of compacting sternally harvested cancellous bone into subchondral bone defects of the medial femoral condyle in horses. Study Design-A controlled experiment using a surgical technique that minimizes soft tissue trauma, customized for consistency among horses. Animals or Sample Population-Ten horses, aged 2 to 5 years, free of hindlimb lameness and with radiographically normal stifles. Methods-After a 12.7-mm-diameter x 19-mm-deep defect was created into randomly selected medial femoral condyles, bone and cartilage healing was evaluated over a 6-month period in control horses (n = 5) and horses receiving a compacted cancellous bone graft (n = 5). Healing was evaluated using lameness assessment, radiographic and microradiographic interpretation, arthroscopic appearance, percent bone fill, proteoglycan content, and histology. Results-Six months after surgery, there was no significant difference between grafted and ungrafted defects with respect to lameness, radiographic score, or percent bone fill. Histologically, grafted defects were characterized by the presence of dead graft and secondary cyst formation in four defects. Ungrafted defects filled with fibrous tissue and no cyst formation were identified. Conclusions-Grafted defects do not heal better than ungrafted defects, and lameness was not affected by surgical technique. Clinical Significance-Cartilage healing is similar in grafted and ungrafted defects in the equine medial femoral condyle at 6 months, suggesting that surgical debridement alone of cystic structures remains the treatment of choice. (C)Copyright 2000 by The American College of Veterinary Surgeons.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available