3.8 Article

Regional distribution of NPC1 protein in monkey brain

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROCYTOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 10, Pages 765-773

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1023/A:1010942521671

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [NS-34339] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R01NS034339] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

NPC1 is a member of a family of polytopic membrane-bound proteins with sterol-sensing domains. Inactivating mutations of NPC1 are responsible for most cases of Niemann-Pick type C disease, whose hallmark is progressive neurodegeneration. The precise molecular mechanisms whereby defective NPC1 function leads to neurodegeneration are unknown. In the brain, we have previously found NPC1 to localize predominantly within perisynaptic astrocytic processes. Here we have mapped the regional distribution of NPC1 in the monkey brain. Dense NPC1 immunoreactivity was observed in telencephalic structures, including the cerebral neocortex, hippocampus, caudate nucleus and putamen, whilst light immunostaining was observed in diencephalic structures, including the globus pallidus, thalamus and hypothalamus. Light staining was also generally observed in the midbrain, pons, medulla oblongata and cerebellum, except the inferior olive, which was densely stained. By light microscopy, only a few indistinctly labeled cell bodies were observed even within densely labeled regions, where most of the immunoreactivity appeared to be due to the large numbers of labeled cellular processes. On electron microscopy, these processes were identified as glial, and not neuronal. The astrocytic localization of NPC1 was further confirmed by double labeling for NPC1 and GFAP. The regional pattern of NPC1 expression suggests that areas normally expressing low levels of the NPC1 protein are more susceptible to neuronal degeneration in Niemann-Pick type C disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available