4.4 Article

Carnosine markedly ameliorates H9N2 swine influenza virus-induced acute lung injury

Journal

JOURNAL OF GENERAL VIROLOGY
Volume 96, Issue -, Pages 2939-2950

Publisher

MICROBIOLOGY SOC
DOI: 10.1099/jgv.0.000238

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province, China [C2011405002, C2015405016]
  2. Natural Science Research Key Program of Educational Department of Hebei Province [ZD20131045]
  3. Natural Science Research Key Program of Hebei North University [ZD201306]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Oxidative stress injury is an important pathogenesis of influenza virus in critically ill patients. The present study investigated the efficacy of carnosine, an antioxidant and free radical scavenger, on a model of acute lung injury (ALI) induced by H9N2 swine influenza virus. Female specific-pathogen-free BALB/c mice were randomized into four groups and treated as follows: (1) H9N2 group, (2) mock control group, (3) H9N2+carnosine group and (4) carnosine control group. The H9N2 group mice were inoculated intranasally with A/Swine/Hebei/012/2008/(H9N2) virus (100 mu l) in allantoic fluid (AF), whilst mock-infected animals were intranasally inoculated with non-infectious AF. Carnosine [10 mg (kg body mass)(-1)] was administered orally (100 mu l) for 7 days consecutively. The survival rate, lung water content, TNF-alpha and IL-beta levels, lung histopathology, myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity, and Toll-like receptor (TLR)-4 levels were determined at 2, 4, 6, 8 and 14 days after inoculation. Carnosine treatment effectively decreased the mortality (43 versus 75 %, P<0.05), significantly ameliorated pathological lesions in lungs and decreased the lung wet/dry mass ratio (P<0.05). It also inhibited MPO activity, suppressed TNF-alpha and IL-1 beta release, decreased the H9N2 viral titre, and markedly inhibited levels of TLR-4 mRNA and protein in the lungs of infected mice (P<0.05), which supported the use of carnosine for managing severe influenza cases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available