3.8 Article

Integrating large-scale soft data by simulated annealing and probability constraints

Journal

MATHEMATICAL GEOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages 49-67

Publisher

KLUWER ACADEMIC/PLENUM PUBL
DOI: 10.1023/A:1007502817679

Keywords

geostatistical simulation; stochastic modeling; reservoir characterization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Interpretation of geophysical data or other indirect measurements provides large-scale soft secondary data for modeling hard primary data variables. Calibration allows such soft data to be expressed as prior probability distributions of nonlinear block averages of the primary variable; poorer quality soft data leads to prior distributions with large variance, better quality soft data leads to prior distributions with low variance. Another important feature of most soft data is that the quality is spatially variable; soft data may be very good in some areas while poorer in other areas. The main aim of this paper is to propose a new method of integrating such soft data, which is large-scale and has locally variable precision. The technique of simulated annealing is used to construct stochastic realizations that reflect the uncertainty in the soft data. This is done by constraining the cumulative probability values of the block average values to follow a specified distribution. These probability values are determined by the local soft prior distribution and a nonlinear average of the small-scale simulated values within the block, which are all known. For each realization to accurately capture the information contained in the soft data distributions, we show that the probability values should by uniformly distributed between 0 and 1. An objective function is then proposed for a simulated annealing based approach to enforce this uniform probability constraint. The theoretical justification of this approach is discussed, implementation details are considered, and an example is presented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available