4.5 Review

Imaging transgene expression with radionuclide imaging technologies

Journal

NEOPLASIA
Volume 2, Issue 1-2, Pages 118-138

Publisher

NATURE AMERICA INC
DOI: 10.1038/sj.neo.7900083

Keywords

imaging; PET; microPET; SPECT; gene expression; herpes simplex virus; thymidine kinase; dopamine 2 receptor; marker gene; reporter gene

Categories

Funding

  1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA069769, R01CA082214, R01CA060706] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA082214, R01 CA60706, R01 CA69769, R01 CA82214-01] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A variety of imaging technologies are being investigated as tools for studying gene expression in living subjects, Noninvasive, repetitive and quantitative imaging of gene expression will help both to facilitate human gene therapy trials and to allow for the study of animal models of molecular and cellular therapy, Radionuclide approaches using single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) are the most mature of the current imaging technologies and offer many advantages for imaging gene expression compared to optical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based approaches. These advantages include relatively high sensitivity, full quantitative capability (for PET), and the ability to extend small animal assays directly into clinical human applications, We describe a PET scanner (microPET) designed specifically for studies of small animals. We review marker/reporter gene imaging approaches using the herpes simplex type 1 virus thymidine kinase (HSV1-tk) and the dopamine type 2 receptor (D2R) genes. We describe and contrast several radiolabeled probes that can be used with the HSV1-tk reporter gene both for SPECT and for PET imaging. We also describe the advantages/disadvantages of each of the assays developed and discuss future animal and human applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available