4.7 Article

The FAO guidelines for the development and use of indicators for sustainable development of marine capture fisheries and an Australian example of their application

Journal

OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT
Volume 43, Issue 7, Pages 537-556

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0964-5691(00)00045-4

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Guidelines for developing and implementing sustainability indicators for marine capture fisheries were drafted during a recent expert consultation jointly organised by Australia and FAO in Sydney (Australia). This paper provides an overview of the guidelines and illustrates their application with an Australian example. As a background to the guidelines, the concept of sustainable development (SD) for marine capture fisheries was discussed and an agreed set of definitions and usage of common terms developed. The guidelines then outline the five sequential steps that need to be addressed in developing a meaningful set of indicators in the context of a Sustainable Development Reference System (SDRS). The five steps are: 1. specifying the scope of the SDRS; 2. developing a framework to agree on components within the system; 3. specifying criteria, objectives, potential indicators and reference values; 4. choosing the set of indicators and reference values; 5. specifying the method of aggregation and visualisation. These steps are further elaborated in terms of how to scope the SDRS, define the dimensions and hierarchical levels to be included in the system, set multiple objectives and link these to indicators and reference values (e.g. targets, thresholds and/or standards). The guidelines also provide some examples of possible indicators, criteria for selecting some indicators over others and present ways of aggregating and visualising the indicators so that progress towards achieving sustainable development can be communicated easily to decision-makers. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available