4.3 Article

Identification of a key residue in Kv7.1 potassium channel essential for sensing external potassium ions

Journal

JOURNAL OF GENERAL PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 145, Issue 3, Pages 201-212

Publisher

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1085/jgp.201411280

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [DC007592, DC010386]
  2. NIH/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [R01 HL085727, R01 HL085844]
  3. VA Merit Review Grant [I01 BX000576]
  4. American Heart Association Western States Affiliate Beginning [14BGIA18870087]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

K(v)7.1 voltage-gated K+ ( K-v) channels are present in the apical membranes of marginal cells of the stria vascularis of the inner ear, where they mediate K+ efflux into the scala media (cochlear duct) of the cochlea. As such, they are exposed to the K+-rich (similar to 150 mM of external K+ (K-e(+))) environment of the endolymph. Previous studies have shown that K(v)7.1 currents are substantially suppressed by high K-e(+) (independent of the effects of altering the electrochemical gradient). However, the molecular basis for this inhibition, which is believed to involve stabilization of an inactivated state, remains unclear. Using sequence alignment of S5-pore linkers of several K-v channels, we identified a key residue, E290, found in only a few K-v channels including K(v)7.1. We used substituted cysteine accessibility methods and patch-clamp analysis to provide evidence that the ability of K(v)7.1 to sense K-e(+) depends on E290, and that the charge at this position is essential for K(v)7.1's K-e(+) sensitivity. We propose that K(v)7.1 may use this feedback mechanism to maintain the magnitude of the endocochlear potential, which boosts the driving force to generate the receptor potential of hair cells. The implications of our findings transcend the auditory system; mutations at this position also result in long QT syndrome in the heart.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available