4.5 Article

Mycoflora and occurrence of fumonisins in freshly harvested and stored hybrid maize

Journal

JOURNAL OF STORED PRODUCTS RESEARCH
Volume 36, Issue 1, Pages 75-87

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-474X(99)00029-6

Keywords

mycoflora; fumonisins; Aspergillus flavus; Fusarium moniliforme; stored maize; fumonisins in maize

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study of the mycoflora in stored grain permits an evaluation of cereal storage conditions that affect grain deterioration and the risk of mycotoxin contamination, Abiotic factors can directly affect the relative frequency of fungal populations in stored grain. The aim of the present work was to study the influence of abiotic factors on variations of mycoflora of freshly harvested and stored maize in Brazil and the occurrence of fumonisins. Samples (195) of three hybrids of maize were analyzed monthly during one year. Microbiological analysis revealed a predominance of Fusarium spp, which presented the greatest total number of colony forming units per gram in the three hybrids, namely: Br 201 (11 x 10(4) to 5340 x 10(4) CFU/g), C 125 (18 x 10(4) to 2790 x 10(4) CFU/g) and Cx 322 (25 x 10(4) to 2940 x 10(4) CFU/g), followed by Penicillium spp, Aspergillus spp and 10 other fungal genera. Fusarium moniliforme Sheldon was the most prevalent species (59.2% of Fusarium isolates in Br 201, 55.4% in C 125 and 69.2% in Cx 322). Fusarium spp showed significant negative correlations with mean temperature and relative humidity of the air. Higher temperatures and relative humidity at the end of the study and high moisture content at the beginning of the study were observed. The CFU/g values recorded for the three predominant genera exceeded the internationally accepted tolerance limits. The mycotoxicological evaluation indicated contamination of 176 samples (90.2%) with fumonisin B(1) and of 190 samples (97.4%) with fumonisin B(2). (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available