4.3 Article

Mechanism for phosphoinositide selectivity and activation of TRPV1 ion channels

Journal

JOURNAL OF GENERAL PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 145, Issue 5, Pages 431-442

Publisher

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1085/jgp.201511354

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Eye Institute of the National Institutes of Health [R01EY017564]
  2. National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [R01GM100718]
  3. National Institutes of Health [S10RR025429, P30 DK017047]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although PI(4,5) P-2 is believed to play an essential role in regulating the activity of numerous ion channels and transporters, the mechanisms by which it does so are unknown. Here, we used the ability of the TRPV1 ion channel to discriminate between PI(4,5) P-2 and PI(4) P to localize the region of TRPV1 sequence that interacts directly with the phosphoinositide. We identified a point mutation in the proximal C-terminal region after the TRP box, R721A, that inverted the selectivity of TRPV1. Although the R721A mutation produced only a 30% increase in the EC50 for activation by PI(4,5) P-2, it decreased the EC50 for activation by PI(4) P by more than two orders of magnitude. We used chemically induced and voltage-activated phosphatases to determine that PI(4) P continued to support TRPV1 activity even after depletion of PI(4,5) P-2 from the plasma membrane. Our data cannot be explained by a purely electrostatic mechanism for interaction between the phosphoinositide and the protein, similar to that of the MARCKS (myristoylated alanine-rich C kinase substrate) effector domain or the EGF receptor. Rather, conversion of a PI(4,5) P-2-selective channel to a PI(4) P-selective channel indicates that a structured phosphoinositide-binding site mediates the regulation of TRPV1 activity and that the amino acid at position 721 likely interacts directly with the moiety at the 5' position of the phosphoinositide.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available