4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Efficacy of interferon alfa-2a in severe and refractory uveitis associated with Behcet's disease

Journal

OCULAR IMMUNOLOGY AND INFLAMMATION
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages 293-301

Publisher

SWETS ZEITLINGER PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1076/ocii.8.4.293.6453

Keywords

Behcet's disease; uveitis; treatment; interferon alfa-2a; blindness

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of interferon alfa-2a (IFN alfa) in severe uveitis associated with Behcet's disease, that is refractory to steroids and conventional immunosuppressive agents. Patients and methods: Patients with Behcet's disease (according to the International Study Group criteria), who relapsed despite steroids and immunosuppressive agents, were included in this retrospective study. Ophthalmological examination, laser flare photometry, and fluorescein angiography associated with laboratory tests were performed at regular intervals. IFN alfa (3 millions units thrice a week) was injected subcutaneously. Results: Eight patients (sex ratio: 1) were included between May 1995 and January 1999. The mean age was 29.1 years (14-54 years) and the disease was present between 11 and 167 months before the administration of IFN alfa. IFN alfa was efficient in all cases with a mean follow-up of 22 months (10-55 months). Steroids were tapered from a mean dosage of 47 mg/d to a mean dosage of 8.5 mg/d. Ocular inflammation was controlled and visual acuity improved in ll cases. Treatment was generally well tolerated despite a constant but transient flu-like syndrome. IFN alfa was tapered in three patients and stopped in one case without any relapse after five months. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this retrospective study, low-dose IFN alfa seems to be well tolerated, promising in the management of refractory forms of uveitis due to Behcet's disease, and effective in allowing a reduction of steroid dosage. A prospective controlled study is necessary to confirm these preliminary results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available