4.8 Article

A randomized controlled trial of psychotherapy in patients with chronic functional dyspepsia

Journal

GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 119, Issue 3, Pages 661-669

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO
DOI: 10.1053/gast.2000.16493

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background & Aims: This study aimed to determine whether brief psychodynamic-interpersonal (PI) psychotherapy is more efficacious than a psychological control for patients with chronic, intractable functional dyspepsia (FD), and whether patients with abnormal gastric function respond differently than those with normal gastric function. Methods: Ninety-five consecutive patients with chronic symptoms of FD who had failed to respond to conventional pharmacologic treatments were approached, Thirty-seven received PI psychotherapy, and 36 the control condition (supportive therapy). Patients completed self-report questionnaires before and after treatment and 12 months later. The patients' gastroenterologists, who were blind to the study groups, conducted independent ratings before and after treatment. Forty-nine patients also underwent a radioisotope gastric emptying study. An intention-to-treat analysis was used with baseline scores as covariates, Results: At the end of treatment, there were significant advantages for PI psychotherapy compared with controls for the gastroenterologists' (P = 0.002) and patients' total symptom score (P = 0.015). One year after treatment, the symptomatic scores were similar. However, a subanalysis showed that PI therapy was superior to the control condition at 1 year, when patients with severe heartburn were excluded. There was no difference in outcome between patients with normal and abnormal gastric emptying. Conclusions: PI therapy may have both short- and long-term effects in patients with dyspepsia, but further evaluation is required, Its cost-effectiveness needs to be determined.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available