4.5 Article

Glycine receptors containing the alpha 4 subunit in the embryonic sympathetic nervous system, spinal cord and male genital ridge

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages 994-1001

Publisher

BLACKWELL SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2000.00993.x

Keywords

dorsal root ganglion; excitatory glycine receptor; glial cells; in situ hybridization; sex cords

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Inhibitory glycine receptors (GlyRs) are known to mediate postsynaptic inhibition in spinal cord, brain stem and some higher brain regions. Several developmentally and regionally regulated GlyR isoforms exist, which result from a differential expression of the GlyR alpha (alpha 1-alpha 4) and beta subunit genes. Currently, very little is known about GlyRs containing the alpha 4 subunit, whose existence was predicted from a partial genomic sequence. Here, we describe the isolation of complementary DNA (cDNA) sequences for the mouse and chick GlyR alpha 4 subunits. We show that a mouse GlyR alpha 4 subunit full-length cDNA directs the formation of functional homo-oligomeric strychnine-sensitive GlyRs in Xenopus laevis oocytes and mammalian cells, and that these resemble GlyRs composed of the alpha 1 subunit in pharmacological profile and single-channel properties. In situ hybridization reveals high levels of GlyR alpha 4 subunit transcripts in the embryonic (E13) chick spinal cord, lumbosacral sympathetic ganglia and dorsal root ganglia. The avian GlyR alpha 4 subunit gene also shows male-specific expression in the developing genital ridge. The pharmacological profile of alpha 4 subunit-containing receptors and deduced location of the avian GlyR alpha 4 subunit are consistent with it being a component of the embryonic excitatory GlyRs previously identified in sympathetic neurons. Our data also suggest a novel role for GlyRs in the maturation of reproductive organs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available