4.7 Article

On the cosmological evolution of the luminosity function and the accretion rate of quasars

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 531, Issue 1, Pages 42-51

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/308468

Keywords

accretion, accretion disks; black hole physics; cosmology : theory; quasars : general

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We consider a class of models for the redshift evolution (between 0 less than or similar to z less than or similar to 4) of the observed optical and X-ray quasar luminosity functions (LFs), with the following assumptions: (1) the mass function of dark matter halos follows the Press-Schechter theory, (2) the black hole (BH) mass scales linearly with the halo mass, (3) quasars have a constant universal lifetime, and (4) a thin accretion disk provides the optical luminosity of quasars, while the X-ray/optical flux ratio is calibrated from a sample of observed quasars. The mass accretion rate, hi, onto quasar BHs is a free parameter of the models, which we constrain using the observed LFs. The accretion rate M inferred from either the optical or X-ray data under these assumptions generally decreases as a function of cosmic time from z similar or equal to 4 to z similar or equal to 0. We find that a comparable accretion rate is inferred from the X-ray and optical LF only if the X-ray/optical flux ratio decreases with BH mass. Near z similar or equal to 0, M drops to substantially sub-Eddington values at which advection-dominated accretion flows (ADAFs) exist. Such a decline of hi, possibly followed by a transition to radiatively inefficient ADAFs, could explain both the absence of bright quasars in the local universe and the faintness of accreting BHs at the centers of nearby galaxies. Vile argue that a decline of the accretion rate of the quasar population is indeed expected in cosmological structure formation models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available