4.7 Article

Pharmacological characterization of small-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels stably expressed in HEK 293 cells

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 129, Issue 5, Pages 991-999

Publisher

STOCKTON PRESS
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703120

Keywords

calcium-activated potassium channel; SK; HEK 293; apamin; scyllatoxin; d-tubocurarine; UCL 1684; dequalinium chloride; bicuculline methiodide; taicatoxin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

1 Three genes encode the small-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels (SK channels). We have stably expressed hSK1 and rSK2 in HEK 293 cells and addressed the pharmacology of these subtypes using whole-cell patch clamp recordings. 2 The bee venom peptide apamin blocked hSK1 as well as rSK2 with IC50 values of 3.3 nM and 83 pM, respectively. 3 The pharmacological separation between the subtypes was even more prominent when applying the scorpion peptide blocker scyllatoxin, which blocked hSK1 with an IC50 value of 80 nM and rSK2 at 257 pM. 4 The potent small molecule blockers showed little differentiation between the channel subtypes. The bis-quinolinium cyclophane UCL 1684 blocked hSK1 with an IC50 value of 762 pM and rSK2 at 364 pM. The antiseptic compound dequalinium chloride blocked hSK1 and rSK2 with IC50 values of 444 nM and 162 nM, respectively. 5 The nicotinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist d-tubocurarine was found to block hSK1 and rSK2 with IC50 values of 27 mu M and 17 mu M when measured at +80 mV. The inhibition by d-tubocurarine was voltage-dependent with increasing affinities at more hyperpolarized potentials. 6 The GABA(A) receptor antagonist bicuculline methiodide also blocked hSK1 and rSK2 in a voltage-dependent manner with IC50 values of 15 and 25 mu M when measured at + 80 mV. 7 In conclusion, the pharmacological separation between SK channel subtypes expressed in mammalian cells is too small to support the notion that the apamin-insensitive afterhyperpolarization of neurones is mediated by hSK1.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available