4.6 Article

Impaired intracellular trafficking of adeno-associated virus type 2 vectors limits efficient transduction of murine fibroblasts

Journal

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
Volume 74, Issue 2, Pages 992-996

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.74.2.992-996.2000

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [P01 HL053586, HL-58881, HL-53586, R01 HL058881] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [P30 DK049218, P50 DK049218, DK-49218] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [P01HL053586, R01HL058881] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [P50DK049218, P30DK049218] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although adeno-associated virus type 2 (AAV) has gained attention as a potentially useful alternative to the more commonly used retrovirus- and adenovirus based vectors for human gene therapy, efficient gene transfer and transgene expression by AAV vectors require that the following two obstacles be overcome. First, the target cell must express the receptor and the coreceptor for AAV infection, and second, the cell must allow for viral second-strand DNA synthesis. We now describe a third obstacle, impaired intracellular trafficking of AAV to the nucleus, which results in the lack of transgene expression in murine fibroblasts which do express the AAV receptor and the coreceptor and which are permissive for viral second-strand DNA synthesis. We document that AAV vectors bind efficiently and gain entry successfully into NIH 3T3 cells, but trafficking into the nucleus is significantly impaired in these cells. In contrast, viral trafficking to the nucleus in cells known to be efficiently transduced by AAV vectors is both rapid and efficient. The demonstration of yet another obstacle in AAV-mediated gene transfer has implications for the optimal use of these vectors in human gene therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available