4.5 Article

Intensive insulin therapy and bone mineral density in type 1 diabetes mellitus: A prospective study

Journal

OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages 455-459

Publisher

SPRINGER-VERLAG LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s001980070114

Keywords

bone mineral density; evolution time; metabolic control; retinopathy; type 1 diabetes mellitus

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To determine the effect of metabolic control on bone mineral density (BMD) in type 1 diabetes mellitus (type 1 DM), we studied BMD (by dual-energy X-ray energy absorptiometry) and bone remodeling parameters in 62 patients with type 1 DM both before and 7 years after commencement of intensive insulin therapy. Overall outcomes after the 7-year treatment included the stabilization of BMD at all sites, as well as a significant decrease in tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) (4.302+/-2.62 vs 2.65+/-0.97 IU/1; p=0.0001) and increase in intact parathyroid hormone (PTHi) (28.05+/-15.7 vs 39.78+/-22.41 ng/l; p = 0.005). Presence of diabetic retinopathy (RTP) versus its absence (non-RTP) was associated with lower BMD in femoral neck (FN) (0.831+/-0.142 vs 0.756+/-0.153 mg/ cm(2); p = 0.03) and Ward's triangle (WT) (0.736+/-0.165 vs 0.632+/-0.172 mg/cm(2); p = 0.03), and with a lower T-score in FN (-0.93+/-1.34 vs -1.70+/-1.46; p = 0.04) and WT (-0.72+/-1.42 vs -1.540+/-1.55; p = 0.04) and Z-score in FN (-0.591+/-1.23 vs -1.132+/-1.46; p=0.01). The percentage of patients with osteopenia or osteoporosis in the RTP group was significantly higher than in the non-RTP group (72% vs 53%, p = 0.05; RR = 3.2) and the glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels of the RTP group were also higher (8.53+/-1.6% vs 7.1+/-1.1%; p = 0.05). The improvement in metabolic control, increase in body mass index and decrease in resorption parameters could contribute to the stabilization of bone mass in type 1 DM but the presence of retinopathy is a critical factor in the progression of diabetic osteopenia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available