4.8 Article

Recruitment of human muscleblind proteins to (CUG)(n) expansions associated with myotonic dystrophy

Journal

EMBO JOURNAL
Volume 19, Issue 17, Pages 4439-4448

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/emboj/19.17.4439

Keywords

DM1; EXP proteins; muscleblind; myotonic dystrophy; RNA dominance

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [T32AI07110-18] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAMS NIH HHS [AR46799, R01 AR046799] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM46272] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [T32AI007110] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES [R01AR046799] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM046272] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Myotonic dystrophy (DM1) is an autosomal dominant neuromuscular disorder associated with a (CTG), expansion in the 3'-untranslated region of the DM1 protein kinase (DMPK) gene. To explain disease pathogenesis, the RNA dominance model proposes that the DM1 mutation produces a gain-of-function at the RNA level in which CUG repeats form RNA hairpins that sequester nuclear factors required for proper muscle development and maintenance. Here, we identify the triplet repeat expansion (EXP) RNA-binding proteins as candidate sequestered factors. As predicted by the RNA dominance model, binding of the EXP proteins is specific for dsCUG RNAs and proportional to the size of the triplet repeat expansion. Remarkably, the EXP proteins are homologous to the Drosophila muscleblind proteins required for terminal differentiation of muscle and photoreceptor cells. EXP expression is also activated during mammalian myoblast differentiation, but the EXP proteins accumulate in nuclear foci in DMI cells. We propose that DM1 disease is caused by aberrant recruitment of the EXP proteins to the DMPK transcript (CUG)(n) expansion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available