4.7 Article

Hypertension in beta-adducin-deficient mice

Journal

HYPERTENSION
Volume 36, Issue 3, Pages 449-453

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.HYP.36.3.449

Keywords

hypertension, genetic; adducin; mice, knockout; echocardiography; cytoskeleton; telemetry; electrocardiography

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Polymorphic variants of the cytoskeletal protein adducin have been associated with hypertension in humans and rats. However, the direct role of this protein in modulating arterial blood pressure has never been demonstrated. To assess the effect of beta-adducin on blood pressure, a beta-adducin-deficient mouse strain (-/-) was studied and compared with wild-type controls (+/+). Aortic blood pressure was measured in nonanesthetized, freely moving animals with the use of telemetry implants. It is important to note that these mice have at least 98% of C57B1/6 genetic background, with the only difference from wild-type animals being the beta-adducin mutation. We found statistically significant higher levels of systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) (mean+/-SE values: -/-: 126.94+/-1.14, n=5; +/+: 108.06+/-2.34, n=6; P less than or equal to 0.0001), diastolic blood pressure (-/-: 83.54+/-1.07; +/+: 74.87+/-2.23; P less than or equal to 0.005), and pulse blood pressure (-/-: 43.32+/-1.10; +/+: 33.19+/-1.96; P less than or equal to 0.001) in beta-adducin-deficient mice. Western blot analysis showed that as a result of the introduced genetic modification, beta-adducin was not present in heart protein extracts from -/- mice. Consequently, this deficiency produced a sharp decrease of alpha-adducin and a lesser reduction in gamma-adducin levels. However, we found neither cardiac remodeling nor modification of the heart function in these animals. This is the first report showing direct evidence that hypertension is triggered by a mutation in the adducin gene family.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available