4.7 Article

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of a new taxoid, RPR 109881A, given as a 1-hour intravenous infusion in patients with advanced solid tumors

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 18, Issue 17, Pages 3164-3171

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.17.3164

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpase: RPR 109881A is a new semisynthetic taxoid compound that has a similar mechanism of action to docetaxel. The purpose of this phase I study was to characterize the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity profile, pharmacokinetic profile, and antitumor effects of this agent. Patients and Methods: Nineteen eligible patients with advanced solid tumors were enrolled. RPR 109881A was administered as a 1-hour intravenous infusion every 3 weeks at doses ranging from 15 to 75 mg/m(2). Pharmacokinetic evaluation was performed at the first cycle. Results: Neutropenia (febrile neutrapenia) and fatigue were dose-limiting toxicities at doses of 60 and 75 mg/m2 and seemed to be dose-related. Both thrombocytapenia and anemia were infrequent. Nonhematologic toxicities were generally mild. Pharmacakinetic studies indicated that RPR 109881A plasma disposition was bi- or triphasic, with a high total plasma clearance, a large volume of distribution, and a long terminal half-life. The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and the peak concentration of RPR 109881A seemed to increase with increasing dose proportionally, suggesting linear pharmacokinetics. Urinary excretion over 48 hours was low, with a mean of 0.8 +/- 0.36% of the administered doze. A significant relationship existed between the percentage decrease of neutraphil counts and the AUC of RPR 109881A. Among 18 assessable patients, two partial and two minor responses were documented. Conclusion: RPR 109881A was found to be a well-tolerated and promising taxoid agent. The MTD was 75 mg/m(2), and the recommended dose for phase II study was 60 mg/m2 as a 1-hour infusion every 3 weeks. (C) 2000 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available