4.4 Article

Discovery of Small Peptide Antagonists of PED/PEA15-D4α Interaction from Simplified Combinatorial Libraries

Journal

CHEMICAL BIOLOGY & DRUG DESIGN
Volume 77, Issue 5, Pages 319-327

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-0285.2011.01094.x

Keywords

competitive assays; enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; simplified combinatorial peptide libraries; surface plasmon resonance

Funding

  1. Ministero dell'Universita e della Ricerca Scientifica (MUR) [RBRN07BMCT]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Most biological processes involve permanent and temporary interactions between different proteins: protein complexes often play key roles in human diseases and, as a consequence, molecules that prevent protein-protein interactions can be potential new therapeutic agents to treat diseases. Here, we describe a simplified approach by which small synthetic peptide libraries were screened to identify the inhibitors of the complex between phosphoprotein enriched in diabetes/phosphoprotein enriched in astrocytes15 (PED/PEA15) and D4 alpha, a functional domain of the phospholipase D1, that is involved in the molecular mechanisms of insulin resistance occurring in type 2 diabetes. By using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based screening, performed on a fully automated platform, we analyzed two simplified peptide libraries in a positional scanning format. This screening led to the identification of small peptides able to inhibit PED/PEA15-D4 alpha interaction. The selection of inhibitors was carried out employing combined competitive and direct experiments, through ELISA and surface plasmon resonance techniques, providing peptides with IC50 values in the micromolar range. Our results showed that the protein complex PED/PEA15-D4 alpha is susceptible to peptides having H-donor groups and aromatic rings on specific positions. These small sequences can be considered as promising scaffolds that could be converted into higher-affinity inhibitor compounds.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available