4.4 Article

Advantages of a Synthetic Peptide Immunogen Over a Protein Immunogen in the Development of an Anti-Pilus Vaccine for Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Journal

CHEMICAL BIOLOGY & DRUG DESIGN
Volume 74, Issue 1, Pages 33-42

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-0285.2009.00825.x

Keywords

anti-adhesin vaccine; antibody; peptide; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; synthetic vaccine

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [RO1-AI048717]
  2. John Stewart Chair in Peptide Chemistry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The type IV pilus is an important adhesin in the establishment of infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. We have previously reported on a synthetic peptide vaccine targeting the receptor-binding domain of the main structural subunit of the pilus, PilA. The receptor-binding domain is a 14-residue disulfide loop at the C-terminal end of the pilin protein. The objective of this study was to compare the immunogenicity of a peptide-conjugate to a protein subunit immunogen to determine which was superior for use in an anti-pilus vaccine. BALB/c mice were immunized with the native PAK strain pilin protein and a synthetic peptide of the receptor-binding domain conjugated to keyhole limpet haemocyanin. A novel pilin protein with a scrambled receptor-binding domain was used to characterize receptor-binding domain-specific antibodies. The titres against the native pilin of the animals immunized with the synthetic peptide-conjugate were higher than the titres of animals immunized with the pilin protein. In addition, the affinities of anti-peptide sera for the intact pilin receptor-binding domain were significantly higher than affinities of anti-pilin protein sera. These results have significant implications for vaccine design and show that there are significant advantages in using a synthetic peptide-conjugate over a subunit pilin protein for an anti-pilus vaccine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available