4.4 Article

The neurocognitive profile of Williams syndrome: A complex pattern of strengths and weaknesses

Journal

JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages 7-29

Publisher

MIT PRESS
DOI: 10.1162/089892900561959

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [P01 HD33113] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDCD NIH HHS [P01 DC01289] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [P50 NS22343] Funding Source: Medline
  4. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [P01HD033113] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [P50NS022343] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DEAFNESS AND OTHER COMMUNICATION DISORDERS [P50DC001289] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The rare, genetically based disorder, Williams syndrome (WMS), produces a constellation of distinctive cognitive, neuroanatomical, and electrophysiological features which we explore through the series of studies reported here. In this paper, we focus primarily on the cognitive characteristics of WMS and begin to forge links among these characteristics, the brain, and the genetic basis of the disorder. The distinctive cognitive profile of individuals with WMS includes relative strengths in language and facial processing and profound impairment in spatial cognition. The cognitive profile of abilities, including what is 'typical' for individuals with WMS is discussed, but we also highlight areas of variability across the group of individuals with WMS that we have studied. Although the overall cognitive abilities (IQs) of individuals with WMS are typically in the mild-to-moderate range of mental retardation, the peaks and valleys within different cognitive domains make this syndrome especially intriguing to study across levels. Understanding the brain basis (and ultimately the genetic basis) for higher cognitive functioning is the goal we have begun to undertake with this line of interdisciplinary research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available