4.7 Article

Overexpression of stathmin in breast carcinomas points out to highly proliferative tumours

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 82, Issue 1, Pages 142-150

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1054/bjoc.1999.0891

Keywords

human breast cancer; stathmin; quantitative RT-PCR; protein phosphorylation; prognostic factors; DNA

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We recently discovered that stathmin was overexpressed in a subgroup of human breast carcinomas. Stathmin is a cytosolic phosphoprotein proposed to act as a relay integrating diverse cell signalling pathways, notably during the control of cell growth and differentiation. it may also be considered as one of the key regulators of cell division for its ability to destabilize microtubules in a phosphorylation-dependent manner. To assess the significance of stathmin overexpression in breast cancer, we evaluated the correlation of stathmin expression, quantified by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. with several disease parameters in a large series of human primary breast cancer (n = 133), obtained in strictly followed up women, whose clinico-pathological data were fully available. In agreement with our preliminary survey, stathmin was found overexpressed in a subgroup of tumours (22%). in addition, overexpression was correlated to the loss of steroid receptors (oestrogen, P = 0.0006; progesterone, P = 0.008), and to the Scarff-Bloom-Richardson histopathological grade III (P = 0.002), this latter being ascribable to the mitotic index component (P = 0.02). Furthermore studies at the DNA level indicated that stathmin is overexpressed irrespective of its genomic status. Our findings raise important questions concerning the causes and consequences of stathmin overexpression, and the reasons of its inability to counteract cell proliferation in the overexpression group. (C) 2000 Cancer Research Campaign.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available