4.7 Article

Clinical and chest radiographic findings among persons with sputum culture positive for Mycobacterium gordonae - A review of 19 cases

Journal

CHEST
Volume 117, Issue 1, Pages 96-102

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1378/chest.117.1.96

Keywords

atypical lung diseases; mycobacterium; radiography

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Study objectives: To describe the clinical and radiographic findings associated,with growth of Mycobacterium gordonae in cultured sputum and to determine the proportion of cases that fulfill criteria for nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease as established by the American Thoracic Society. Design: A retrospective review of charts and radiographs of all patients from whom M gordonae was isolated from sputum cultures between November 1996 and June 1998, Setting: University-affiliated Veterans Affairs hospital, Patients: Nineteen patients mere identified with sputum culture positive for M gordonae,All patients had a chest radiograph within 1 month of sputum culture. Results: Sixteen patients (84%) had suppressed local and/or general immunity. Sixteen patients (84%) had respiratory symptoms, weight loss, fever, or night sweats as an indication for chest radiograph,. Seventeen patients (89%) had abnormal chest radiographs; however, no typical radiographic pattern was observed. No patient met diagnostic criteria for nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease as delineated by the American Thoracic Society. All patients with abnormal chest radiographs and/or respiratory symptoms ultimately had alternative explanations for their pulmonary disease. Conclusions: There is a broad spectrum of chest radiographic findings among persons with sputum culture positive for M gordonae, arguing against the presence of a characteristic chest radiograph in this patient population. M gordonae is usually a nonpathogenic colonizing organism, even among persons with local or general immune suppression and abnormal chest radiograph findings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available