4.7 Article

Antigen inhalation unmasks NK-2 tachykinin receptor-mediated responses in vagal afferents

Journal

Publisher

AMER LUNG ASSOC
DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.161.1.9903091

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R29HL038095, R01HL038095] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R01NS022069] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL38095] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NINDS NIH HHS [NS22069, NS07375] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The majority of airway sensory innervation originates from afferent neurons whose somata reside in vagal (nodose and jugular) ganglia. Using guinea pigs immunized with chick ovalbumin, we have discovered that airway inflammation provokes phenotypic changes in the tachykinin responsiveness of nodose neurons. Bath application of substance P (SP; 0.1 to 10 mu M) to nodose neurons isolated from guinea pigs with normal uninflamed airways did not elicit measurable changes in resting electrophysiological properties. In sharp contrast, 80% of nodose neurons isolated 24 h after in vivo aerosolized antigen challenge of the airway were depolarized by 100 nM SP. Inhalation of a nonantigenic protein did not evoke the expression of SP responses. Pharmacological analysis revealed that SP responses unmasked by airway inflammation were mediated by neurokinin-2 (NK-2) tachykinin receptors. There are several potential mechanisms for transduction of an unmasking signal from the inflamed airway to vagal afferent somata. The vagus nerve may relay the signal, either through anterograde transport and/or nerve impulse activity. Alternatively, a signal generated by airway inflammation may be carried by the circulation to the nodose ganglia. Unilateral vagotomy significantly reduced the percentage of SP-responsive neurons compared with intact controls, suggesting that the vagus nerve is required for unmasking of NK-2 responses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available