4.5 Article

Mechano-insensitive nociceptors encode pain evoked by tonic pressure to human skin

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages 793-800

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0306-4522(00)00189-5

Keywords

C-fiber; polymodal nociceptor; static mechanical hyperalgesia; anti-inflammatory analgesics; microneurography; psychophysics

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Single unmyelinated axons in the superficial branch of the peroneal nerve of human subjects were recorded (microneurography) and the response patterns during tonic pressure stimulation (14 N at 30 mm(2); 120 a) were assessed using the previously described marking technique. It was found that tonic pressure stimuli induced augmenting pain responses which were matched by the discharges of initially mechano-insensitive (silent) C-units, whereas mechano- and heat-responsive polymodal C-nociceptors showed a response pattern incompatible with the stimulus-induced perceptions, namely strong initial excitation, followed by adaptation. Eighteen mechano- and heat-responsive polymodal C-fibers and 11 mechano-insensitive units were studied. The former had von Frey thresholds <160 mN, the latter were not excited by a von Frey filament of 750 mN (six of them responded to radiant heat stimulation). However, in the course of pressure stimulation, nine of the 11 mechano-insensitive units were activated after more than 20 s. A second, identical pressure stimulus induced a stronger response in mechano-insensitive and a weaker response in mechano-responsive units. The stronger response, indicating sensitization, matched the more intense pain perception during the second pressure stimulus. It is concluded that mechano-insensitive C-nociceptors encode pressure-induced pain in human hairy skin and that they play an important role in static mechanical hyperalgesia. (C) 2000 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available