4.3 Article

Identification of a Novel Cannabimimetic Phenylacetylindole, Cannabipiperidiethanone, as a Designer Drug in a Herbal Product and Its Affinity for Cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 Receptors

Journal

CHEMICAL & PHARMACEUTICAL BULLETIN
Volume 59, Issue 9, Pages 1203-1205

Publisher

PHARMACEUTICAL SOC JAPAN
DOI: 10.1248/cpb.59.1203

Keywords

synthetic cannabinoid; JWH-081; JWH-122; 2-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-{1-[(1-methylpiperidin-2-yl)methyl]-1H-indol-3-yl}ethanone; JWH-250; designer drug

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new cannabimimetic phenylacetylindole (cannabipiperidiethanone, 1) has been found as an adulterant in a herbal product which contains two other known synthetic cannabinoids, JWH-122 and JWH-081, and which is distributed illegally in Japan. The identification was based on analyses using GC-MS, LC-MS, high-resolution MS and NMR. Accurate mass spectrum measurement showed the protonated molecular ion peak of 1 at m/z 377.2233 [M+H](+) and the molecular formula of 1 was C24H29N2O2. Both mass and NMR spectrometric data revealed that 1 was 2-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-{1-[(1-methylpiperidin-2-yl)methyl]-1H-indol-3-yl}ethanone. Compound 1 has a mixed structure of known cannabimimetic compounds: JWH-250 and AM-2233. Namely, the moiety of phenylacetyl indole and N-methylpiperidin-2-yl-methyl correspond to the structure of JWH-250 and AM-2233, respectively. However, no synthetic, chemical or biological information about 1 has been reported. A binding assay of compound 1 to cannabinoid receptors revealed that 1 has affinity for the CB1 and CB2 (IC50 = 591, 968 nm, respectively) receptors, and shows 2.3- and 9.4-fold lower affinities than those of JWH-250. This is the first report to identify cannabimimetic compound (1) as a designer drug and to show its binding affinity to cannabinoid receptors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available