4.8 Article

Loss-of-heterozygosity analysis of small-cell lung carcinomas using single-nucleotide polymorphism arrays

Journal

NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages 1001-1005

Publisher

NATURE AMERICA INC
DOI: 10.1038/79269

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [5T34CA72320-03] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHGRI NIH HHS [HG01806] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [T32CA072320] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE [R01HG001806] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human cancers arise by a combination of discrete mutations and chromosomal alterations. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of chromosomal regions bearing mutated tumor suppressor genes is a key event in the evolution of epithelial and mesenchymal tumors'. Global patterns of LOH can be understood through allelotyping of tumors with polymorphic genetic markers(2), Simple sequence length polymorphisms (SSLPs, or microsatellites) are reliable genetic markers for studying LOH3, but only a modest number of SSLPs are used in LOH studies because the genotyping procedure is rather tedious. Here, we report the use of a highly parallel approach to genotype large numbers of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for LOH, in which samples are genotyped for nearly 1,500 loci by performing 24 polymerase chain reactions (PCR), Fooling the resulting amplification products and hybridizing the mixture to a high-density oligonucleotide array(4). We characterize the results of LOH analyses on human small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and control DNA samples by hybridization. We show that the patterns of LOH are consistent with those obtained by analysis with both SSLPs(5) and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), whereas amplifications rarely are detected by the SNP array. The results validate the use of SNP array hybridization for tumor studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available