4.2 Article

Effects of iron and zinc deficiency on elemental composition and silica production by diatoms

Journal

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
Volume 195, Issue -, Pages 71-79

Publisher

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/meps195071

Keywords

diatoms; silicon; iron; zinc; silica production

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cellular silicon, nitrogen, and carbon content and the kinetics of silicic acid use were determined for Thalassiosira weissflogii grown under nutrient-replete, iron-deficient, and zinc-deficient conditions to assess the effect of metal deficiency on diatom silicon metabolism. Iron- and zinc-deficient T. weissflogii cells contained 40 and 66% more silicon, respectively, than their nutrient-replete counterparts. Low Zn and low Fe also increased cellular C and N content. Low Zn increased cellular carbon by 55% and cellular N by 41%. Low Fe increased cellular C and N by 68 and 45%, respectively. Fe stress did not alter cellular Si/N ratios significantly, but Si/C ratios declined by 17%. In contrast, Zn stress increased Si/C and Si/N ratios by 41 and 53%, respectively. Both Zn and Fe stress dramatically altered the kinetics of silica production by T. weissflogii. Zn deficiency increased the half saturation constant (K-s) 64% and decreased the maximum specific uptake rate (V-max) by 60%. In contrast, Fe stress did not affect the value of K-s, but decreased V-max by 66%, similar to the decrease observed under low Zn. The decrease in V-max in Zn-deficient cells was almost entirely due to the higher biogenic silica content of the metal-deficient cells. The decline in V-max under Fe stress resulted from both the increase in cellular silica content and a 50% decline in the cellular uptake rates for silicic acid. The results indicate that Fe and Zn availability can significantly alter silicification in diatoms and affect the number and efficiency of silicon transport molecules in the cell membrane.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available