4.6 Article

A comparison of the hinge and near-hinge flow fields of the St Jude Medical Hemodynamic Plus and Regent bileaflet mechanical heart valves

Journal

JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
Volume 119, Issue 1, Pages 83-93

Publisher

MOSBY-YEAR BOOK INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5223(00)70221-2

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The most widely implanted prosthetic valves are the mechanical bileaflets, most of which have good forward flow hemodynamics. However, recent clinical experiences illustrate the importance of understanding the flow structures generated within the hinge. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the hinge-flow dynamics of two new variations of a 17-mm St Jude Medical bileaflet valve: the Hemodynamic Plus and the Regent (St Jude Medical, Inc, St Paul, Minn), Methods Clinical quality reproductions of the valves were manufactured with clear housings, Laser Doppler velocimetry velocity and turbulent shear stress measurements were conducted within the hinge and thumbnail regions of the valves. Results: In the 17-mm Hemodynamic Plus hinge, a rotating flow structure developed in the inflow pocket during forward flow. During systole, velocities through the hinge pocket reached 0.70 m/s, and the turbulent shear stress reached 1000 dynes/cm(2). In the thumbnail, forward flow velocities ranged from 1.4 m/s to 1.7 m/s, In the 17-mm Regent hinge, a rotating flow structure partially developed in the inflow pocket during forward flow. During systole, velocities through the hinge pocket reached 0.75 m/s, and the turbulent shear stress reached 1300 dynes/cm(2). In the thumbnail, forward flow velocities ranged from 1.0 m/s to 1.3 m/s, Conclusions: The active leaflet motion through the St Jude Medical hinge creates a washout pattern that restricts the persistence of stagnation zones and thus may be a contributing factor to its successful clinical performance. The hinge and thumbnail flow dynamics of the 17-mm Regent valve are at least equivalent to, and possibly superior to, those of the 17-mm Hemodynamic Plus valve.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available