4.6 Article

Importance of donor number in determining solvating ability of polymers and transport properties in gel-type polymer electrolytes

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 45, Issue 13, Pages 2101-2109

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0013-4686(99)00426-0

Keywords

gel-type polymer electrolytes; Li polymer batteries; donor numbers; Li+ transference numbers; salts-polymer interactions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The importance of donor number affecting ion-solvating ability of polymers and transport properties was demonstrated in gel-type polymer electrolytes. Four different polymers, poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO), poly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA), poly(acrylonitrile) (PAN), and poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVdF)-hexafluoropropane (HFP) copolymer, were employed as the gel-forming polymer matrix, and the mixture of ethylene carbonate (EC) and propylene carbonate (PC) was used as the liquid constituent. The infrared spectroscopic study indicated that the polymers can partially solvate Li+ ions with different solvating ability, PEO > PMMA > PAN > P(VdF-HFP) in a decreasing order, in both the solvent-free and gel states. This trend was not correlated with the dielectric constant of the polymeric functional groups but strongly with their donor number. The free-ion fraction was higher when the polymers of a higher donor number were used as the gel-forming matrix, but the cation transference number showed the opposite trend, presumably due to the retardation effect exerted by stronger Li+-polymer interactions. The importance of donor number was further demonstrated in the poly(ethylene glycol dimethacrylate)-modified PMMA and P(VdF-HFP)-based gel electrolytes, where the addition of an ethylene oxide unit of a higher donor number brings about an increase in the free-ion fraction but a decrease in the cation transference number. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available