4.6 Article

Observation of EEG coherence after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Journal

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 111, Issue 9, Pages 1620-1631

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00357-6

Keywords

coherence; directed; EEG; topography; magnetic stimulation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The effects before and after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on EEG activity were investigated. Methods: Nineteen healthy subjects received two trains (10 Hz, 100% of motor threshold, 3 s/train) of rTMS to the left frontal area. Directed coherence and ordinary coherence were calculated from EEG epochs recorded before and after (1 similar to 3 and 3 similar to 5 min) rTMS. The results were compared and demonstrated on maps. Results: Directed coherence between cortical areas increased after rTMS (F = 5.62, P < 0.005), with the intra-hemispheric change being more pronounced than the inter-hemispheric change. Connections from the stimulated site to other sites were selectively reinforced. In contrast, ordinary coherence did not change after the stimulation. rTMS did not influence the dominant frequency at which maximal coherence was calculated. Differences in the directed coherence with opposite directions after rTMS were significantly correlated with the differences before rTMS (r = 0.88, 0.89, P < 0.001). Conclusions: (1) rTMS can enhance the connections between cortical areas, especially connections between the stimulated cortex and other sites in the brain. (2) Comparing with connections from the parietal area to frontal area, connections from the frontal area to parietal area are obviously improved by rTMS in both hemispheres. (3) The effects of rTMS can last for several minutes. Therefore, the necessity of EEG monitoring in rTMS studies is suggested. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available