4.5 Article

Parent-teacher concordance for DSM-IV attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in a clinic-referred sample

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00004583-200003000-00012

Keywords

attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; diagnosis; concordance; parent report; teacher report

Funding

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R01MH046448] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [1 RO1 MH46448] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To examine concordance between parent and teacher reports of DSM-IV attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and its symptoms. Method: Parents and teachers of 74 clinically referred children were interviewed using the ADHD module of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children. Parent-teacher agreement for the diagnosis of ADHD and its subtypes, as defined in DSM-IL: as well as parent-teacher concordance of in-school ADHD symptoms, was examined. Results: Agreement between parents and teachers was found to be relatively poor, with virtually no agreement for individual ADHD subtypes. Diagnoses based on either parent or teacher report frequently yielded a diagnosis of either inattentive or hyperactive-impulsive subtype of ADHD. However, when cross-informant data were used to form diagnoses, these subtypes became relatively rare, with most cases meeting criteria for ADHD combined type. In addition, parent reports of in-school behavior were more highly correlated with their own reports of their child's behavior at home than with teacher reports of their child's behavior in school. Conclusions: These data suggest that the diagnosis of ADHD inattentive or hyperactive-impulsive subtype based on data from a single informant may be of questionable validity, and they point to the importance of using multiple informants when diagnosing this disorder in clinically referred samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available