3.8 Article Proceedings Paper

Effect of W addition on compressive strength of Nb-10Mo-10Ti-18Si-Base in-situ composites

Journal

MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS JIM
Volume 41, Issue 9, Pages 1125-1128

Publisher

JAPAN INST METALS
DOI: 10.2320/matertrans1989.41.1125

Keywords

refractory metal-intermetallic composites; niobium solid solution; niobium silicide; arc casting; directional solidification; Vickers hardness; high-temperature compressive strength

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Niobium solid solution/niobium silicides in-situ composites are expected to have applications in the future as high-temperature structural materials. To improve the high temperature strength further, we tried to add tungsten to Nb-10Mo-10Ti-18Si eutectic alloy by replacing Nb with 0, 5, 10 and 15 mol%W. The samples were prepared by are casting and some of them were directionally solidified by the floating zone melting technique at a growth rate of 15 mm/h. After annealing at 1870 K for 100 h, the microstructure? Vickers hardness and high-temperature compressive strength were examined. The samples without W consisted of eutectic Nb solid solution and (Nb, Mo, Ti)(5)Si-3 silicide, while primary Nb solid solution appeared as a result of substituting W for Nb. The microstructure of directionally solidified samples was coarse and oriented in the direction of growth, but they did not show the typical microstructure often observed in the case of directionally solidified materials. The Vickers hardness increased with increasing W content. The 0.2% yield strength (sigma (0.2)) and the specific 0.2% yield strength (sigma (0.2S)) (sigma (0.2) divided by the density) at 1670 K increased markedly with increasing W content. The directionally solidified samples showed higher sigma (0.2) and sigma (0.2S) than the are-cast samples. Even at 1770 K, the directionally solidified sample with 15 mol% W showed sigma (0.2) of about 650 MPa.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available