4.1 Article

Effect of transforming growth factor beta 1 on chondrogenic differentiation of cultured equine mesenchymal stem cells

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH
Volume 61, Issue 9, Pages 1003-1010

Publisher

AMER VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.2000.61.1003

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective-To determine the morphologic and phenotypic effects of transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-beta 1) on cultured equine mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) and articular chondrocytes. Sample Population-Bone marrow aspirates and articular cartilage samples from a 2-year-old and two 8-month-old horses. Procedure-After initial isolation and culture, MSC and chondrocytes were cultured in Ham's F-12 medium supplemented with TGF-beta 1 at a concentration of 0, 1, 5, or 10 ng/ml. Medium was exchanged on day 2, and cells were harvested on day 4. Medium was assayed for proteoglycan (PG) content. Total RNA was isolated from cell cultures, and expression of aggrecan, decrin, collagen type-I, and collagen type-II mRNA was assessed by means of Northern blot analyses. Cell cultures were stained with H&E or toluidine blue and examined histologically. Additional cultures were examined after immunohistochemical staining for type-I and -II collagen. Results-MSC cultures exposed to TGF-beta 1 had an increased cellular density with cell layering and nodule formation that was most pronounced in cultures treated with 5 ng of TGF-beta 1/ml. Expression of collagen type-ii mRNA in MSC cultures exposed to 5 ng of TGF-beta 1/ml was 1.7 times expression in control cultures, and expression of collagen type-I mRNA was 2.8 times expression in control cultures. Treatment of MSC with TGF-beta 1 led to dose-related increases in area and intensity of type-II collagen immunoreaction. Conclusion-Results suggest that TGF-beta 1 enhances chondrogenic differentiation of bone marrow-derived MSC in a dose-dependent manner.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available