4.4 Article

The meaning of diagnostic test results: A spreadsheet for swift data analysis

Journal

CLINICAL RADIOLOGY
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages 227-235

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1053/crad.1999.0444

Keywords

diagnostic techniques; procedures; imaging; radiology; Bayes' theorem; sensitivity; specificity; likelihood functions; decision making; computers; software

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AIMS: To design a spreadsheet program to: (a) analyse rapidly diagnostic test result data produced in local research or reported in the literature; (b) correct reported predictive values for disease prevalence in any population; (c) estimate the post-test probability of disease in individual patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Microsoft Excel(TM) was used, Section A: a contingency (2 x 2) table was incorporated into the spreadsheet. Formulae for standard calculations [sample size, disease prevalence, sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals, predictive values and likelihood ratios (LRs)] were linked to this table. The results change automatically when the data in the true or false negative and positive cells are changed. Section B: this estimates predictive values in any population, compensating for altered disease prevalence. Sections C-F: Bayes' theorem was incorporated to generate individual post-test probabilities. The spreadsheet generates 95% confidence intervals, LRs and a table and graph of conditional probabilities once the sensitivity and specificity of the test are entered. The tatter shows the expected post-test probability of disease for any pre-test probability when a test of known sensitivity and specificity is positive or negative, RESULTS: This spreadsheet can be used on desktop and palmtop computers. The MS Excel(TM) version can be downloaded via the Internet from the URL ftp://radiography.com/pub/Rad-data99.xls CONCLUSION: A spreadsheet is useful for contingency table data analysis and assessment of the clinical meaning of diagnostic test results. (C) 2000 The Royal College of Radiologists.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available