3.8 Article

Modifications of the hemodynamic consequences of theophylline intoxication with landiolol in halothane-anesthetized dogs

Journal

Publisher

CANADIAN ANAESTHETISTS SOC INC
DOI: 10.1007/BF03018925

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To examine the effect of landiolol (ONO-1101), a new ultra-short acting, highly selective beta, blocker, on hemodynamic response to acute theophylline intoxication in anesthetized dogs. Methods: Thirty-four dogs were studied during halothane anesthesia. Aminophylline (50 mg.k(-1) over 20 min followed by infusion at 1.75 mg.k(-1).hr(-1)) was administered as a model of acute theophylline intoxication. Dogs were randomly enrolled into four landiolol groups (0, 1, 10, 100 mu g.kg(-1).min(-1)) to treat tachyarrhythmias. Hemodynamic variables, heart rate (HR), systemic blood pressure (SBP), pulmonary artery pressure, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, and cardiac output (CO) were measured along with plasma concentrations of theophylline, epinephrine, and norepinephrine. Results: After 60 min, plasma concentration of theophylline reached 46.6 +/- 4.0 (mean +/- SD) mu g.ml(-1), HR increased from 129 +/- 21 to 193 +/- 27 bpm (P < 0.0001)and CO increased from 1.6 +/- 0.5 1.min(-1) to 2.1 +/- 0.4 1.min(-1) (P < 0.0001), whereas SEP decreased from 139 +/- 25 to 121 +/- 25 mm Hg (P < 0.0001), with decreasing systemic vascular resistance. After intoxication, plasma epinephrine concentration increased from 125 +/- 112 to 325 +/- 239 pg.ml(-1) (P < 0.0001), and norepinephrine concentration from 103 +/- 61 to 133 +/- 61 pg.ml(-1) (P < 0.0011). Landiolol 10 mu g.kg(-1).min(-1) decreased HR to pre-intoxication level, whereas HR returned to the intoxication baseline by 30 min after cessation of landiolol infusion. Conclusions: Landiolol controlled tachyarrhythmias associated with theophylline toxicity The optimal effective dose of landiolol was 10 mu g.kg(-1) min(-1).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available