4.3 Article

Reference values of indices of spontaneous baroreceptor reflex sensitivity

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages 268-275

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/S0895-7061(99)00172-7

Keywords

cardiovascular physiology; baroreflex; autonomic nervous system; heart rate variability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spontaneous baroreceptor reflex sensitivity (BRS) is a well established method for determining baroreflex function, which can be used to assess the potential impact on survival after myocardial infarction, to detect autonomic dysfunction in diabetic patients and in human essential hypertension. The assessment of impaired spontaneous baroreflex function in individual patients contains important clinical information, but age-dependent reference values are still lacking. In the present study we evaluated spontaneous BRS in healthy human controls to determine reference values as a function of age. Two hundred and sixty-two healthy volunteers divided into six age groups (I: <20 years, f = 11, m = 9, II: 20-29 years, f = 42, m = 37, III: 30-39 years, f = 23, m = 37, IV: 40-49 years, f = 27, m 25 V: 50-59 years, f = 19, m = 17, VI: 60-69 years, f = 5, m = 13). Electrocardiograms (ECG) and finger arterial BP were measured with each subject in the supine position (sup, 7 min) and during deep breathing (dB, 6/min, 15 cycles). BRS was assessed using the sequence technique and the alpha coefficients as obtained from a power spectrum density estimate. Due to the normal logarithmic distribution of the BRS, the limits for impaired baroreflex function at rest were defined from logarithmic data. The limits for the BRS at rest (P = .025) were calculated as (-0.0283 x age) + 2.5198 for the sequence technique. We did not find significant differences in BRS among the female and male healthy volunteers. Our analysis of the six age groups showed the expected significant decrease in BRS, which was most prominent at the transition from group III (<40 years) to group IV (<50 years). BRS at rest and during deep breathing as well as sequential and spectral BRS indices did differ significantly. The results underline the necessity of reference values to evaluate impaired baroreflex function in individual patients. Am J Hypertens 2000; 13:268-275 (C) 2000 American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available