Journal
CARBON
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages 535-546Publisher
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0008-6223(99)00133-5
Keywords
petroleum pitch, mesophase; pyrolysis; infrared spectroscopy, NMR
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Pyrolysis of two petroleum residues, R1 and R2 of different aromaticities, were studied at 0.1 and 1.0 MPa, 420-480 degrees C, for soak times up to 12 h. Pyrolysis was followed by extracting resultant semicokes, sequentially, with heptane, toluene and N-methyl-pyrrolidinone to obtain four fractions HS, TS, NMPS and NMPI. Development of the anisotropic mesophase was monitored by polarised light optical microscopy. The extraction and microscopy methods are critically compared in monitoring pyrolysis pr ogress. Differences between measured growths of the extraction fractions and anisotropy are explained. Growth in aromaticity in the HS and TS was followed using H-1-NMR and FTIR (CHal/CHar), and in NMPS and NMPI fractions by FTIR. Vapour pressure osmometry estimated average molecular weights of four fractions from R1. Aromaticities in the final semicokes from R1 and R2, a ere very similar, despite initial differences in the parent feedstocks, Growth in constituent molecular size probably occurs via a consecutive reaction mechanism. The early stages of pyrolysis involve dealkylation reactions. Early mesophase still contains significant amounts of aliphatic side-chains, which are reduced as pyrolysis proceeds. Rates of transfer of HS to TS to NMPS to NMPI for R1 and R2 are compared. The paper reports in considerable detail aspects of the chemistry of these processes. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd, All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available