4.7 Review

The effects of structure and its dynamics on the ecology and conservation of arthropods in British grasslands

Journal

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages 129-142

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00028-8

Keywords

arthropods; grassland; structure; dynamics; succession; management systems; rotation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The importance of structure in grasslands to arthropods is emphasised. Community dynamics below ground are briefly described. The characteristics of stenophagous, polyphagous, predacious and parasitoid arthropods in relation to structure are outlined. Tall grassland supports more species, individuals and a greater diversity of arthropods than short swards, but some species are characteristic of the latter. The classification of structure in grassland is briefly reviewed. Change in grassland structure occurs through the opposing forces of succession and, in most cases, management. The commonest method of management is grazing, which is characterised by selectivity in the foliage eaten, treading of the sward and deposition of dung. Cutting is sudden, but its effects of defoliation are similar to those of grazing. Burning is considered in less detail. Ploughing, rotovating, re-seeding, fertiliser application, translocation and set-aside are generally forms of agricultural or 'creative' management. Human treading can have severe effects on invertebrate diversity and abundance. Management interacts with other factors, such as seasonality, timing, topography, site-specific characteristics and connectivity to produce varied effects on arthropods. The various types of management systems, reclamation, maintenance, agricultural, rotational and others are discussed in relation to management plans and objectives in conservation. It is concluded that conservationists need to be more aware of grassland dynamics, that management by reference to past land-use must be tempered by full consideration of ecological factors and conservation aims and that 'practical' and 'theoretical' conservationists need to interact more effectively. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available