4.5 Article

The effect of variability of unattended information on global and local processing: evidence for lateralization at early stages of processing

Journal

NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages 225-239

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00080-9

Keywords

object; vision; hemisphere; extrastriate; feedback; ERP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Visual objects can often be analyzed as hierarchical in structure, composed of local elements that are spatially arranged to form a global shape. The brain mechanisms involved in the analysis of hierarchical figures have been under considerable scrutiny in recent years, and one of the many interesting features that have emerged is that there is an asymmetry across the two hemispheres for global (right hemisphere) vs local (left hemisphere) processing. Event-related potentials (ERP) were used to examine selective attention to global or local levels of hierarchical figures to determine the stage of processing at which the asymmetry first emerges. Two conditions were tested, one in which unattended information was variable from trial to trial, and one in which it was not. The variability of unattended information influenced the lateralization of processing. Presentation of invariable, neutral distracters resulted in global/local processing asymmetries at early stages (P1). In contrast, presentation of variable, task-relevant distractors resulted in processing asymmetries that occurred at much later stages (N2). Our hypothesis is that lateralized enhancement of neural populations in extrastriate cortex results from both selective attention to locations in the visual field, as well as selective attention to global or local information. We suggest that unattended information that varies from trial to trial is processed in parallel with attended information, masking hemisphere biases for local vs global information at early stages of processing. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available