4.5 Article

Influence of the D genome in conferring resistance to fusarium head blight in spring wheat

Journal

EUPHYTICA
Volume 114, Issue 3, Pages 181-186

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1023/A:1004065620127

Keywords

'D' genome chromosomes; ear blight; microsatellite primers; pentaploids

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reciprocal crosses were made between resistant hexaploid spring wheat cultivars/lines Sumai 3, Ning8331, and 93FHB21, and susceptible tetraploids Stewart 63 and DT486 to generate 35 chromosome pentaploids. Four heads from each of five F-1 pentaploid plants from each cross were screened with Fusarium graminearum for fusarium head blight (FHB) reaction. No pentaploid was as resistant to FHB as the resistant parents. Pentaploids derived from several crosses were more resistant than the susceptible parents, a few were more susceptible, and all plants from crosses with 93FHB21 failed to survive. Most viable seeds were obtained from the cross Sumai 3 x DT486. From this cross four of the five F-1 pentaploid parents were fertile and 354 F-2 seeds derived from these four pentaploids were sown and evaluated for their FHB reaction. The majority of F-2 plants from pentaploids 1 and 3 had the visual appearance and level of resistance of Sumai 3, whereas progeny from pentaploids 4 and 5 were more varied morphologically and generally more susceptible. Forty-three of the screened F-2 plants were tested for the presence of specific D chromosomes by wheat microsatellite analysis. There was no relationship between presence/absence of D chromosomes and FHB reaction. Twenty-four lines had all D chromosomes present of which 10 were intermediate-susceptible and 14 were resistant to FHB. Three lines, one resistant and two intermediate, had no D chromosomes. The remainder had between 1 and 6 of the D chromosomes present and ranged from resistant to susceptible in FHB reaction. It appears that FHB resistance is not conferred by the D genome of Sumai 3.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available