4.3 Article

alpha-helical structural elements within the voltage-sensing domains of a K+ channel

Journal

JOURNAL OF GENERAL PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 115, Issue 1, Pages 33-49

Publisher

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1085/jgp.115.1.33

Keywords

secondary structure; scanning mutagenesis; amphipathic; Fourier transform; voltage-dependent gating

Categories

Funding

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [Z01NS002945] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. Intramural NIH HHS [ZIA NS002945-13] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Voltage-gated K+ channels are tetramers with each subunit containing six (S1-S6) putative membrane spanning segments. The fifth through sixth transmembrane segments (S5-S6) from each of four subunits assemble to form a central pore domain. A growing body of evidence suggests that the first four segments (S1-S4) comprise a domain-like voltage-sensing structure. While the topology of this region is reasonably well defined, the secondary and tertiary structures of these transmembrane segments are not. To explore the secondary structure of the voltage-sensing domains, we used alanine-scanning mutagenesis through the region encompassing the first four transmembrane segments in the drk1 voltage-gated K+ channel. We examined the mutation-induced perturbation in gating free energy for periodicity characteristic of alpha-helices. Our results are consistent with at least portions of S1, S2, S3, and S4 adopting alpha-helical secondary structure. In addition, both the S1-S2 and S3-S4 linkers exhibited substantial helical character: The distribution of gating perturbations for S1 and S2 suggest that these two helices inter-act primarily with two environments. In contrast, the distribution of perturbations for S3 and S4 were more complex, suggesting that the latter two helices make more extensive protein contacts, possibly interfacing directly with the shell of the pore domain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available