4.7 Article

Ash formation mechanisms during of combustion in reducing conditions

Journal

ENERGY & FUELS
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages 150-159

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ef990095u

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A range of pulverized coals were combusted in a laboratory drop-tube furnace at temperatures of 1573, 1723, and 1873 K under oxidizing and reducing conditions to determine the effect of combustion stoichiometry on ash formation mechanisms. As iron mineral transformations were expected to be most affected by combustion stoichiometry, two of the test coals chosen were of high pyrite (FeS2) content and two of high siderite (FeCO3) content. It was found that the ash formation mechanisms of excluded quartz, koalinite, and calcite were not affected by oxidizing or reducing combustion conditions. Excluded pyrite was found to decompose to pyrrhotite, which oxidized to produce an FeO-FeS melt phase which was stable under reducing conditions. Under oxidizing conditions oxidation continued, producing magnetite and hematite. Excluded siderite was found to decompose to wustite, which was stable under reducing conditions, but oxidized to produce magnetite under oxidizing conditions. Included pyrite and siderite were determined to behave as for excluded pyrite and siderite if there was no contact with alumino-silicates. Included pyrite that contacted alumino-silicate minerals was observed to form two-phase FeS/Fe-glass ash particles, with incorporation of iron into the glass proceeding as the FeS phase was oxidized. Included siderite that contacted alumino-silicate minerals was determined to directly form iron alumino-silicate glass ash particles. Iron alumino-silicate glass ash was determined to form with iron in the Fe2+ state, much of which subsequently transformed to the Fe3+ state in oxidizing conditions, but remained primarily as in the Fe2+ state under reducing conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available