4.7 Article

Safety and biological efficacy of a lipid-CFTR complex for gene transfer in the nasal epithelium of adult patients with cystic fibrosis

Journal

MOLECULAR THERAPY
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages 105-114

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1006/mthe.1999.0009

Keywords

liposome; gene transfer; cystic fibrosis; CFTR; EDMPC

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR0046] Funding Source: Medline
  2. PHS HHS [34322] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [M01RR000046] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gene transfer is an attractive option to treat the basic defect in cystic fibrosis. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, rising-dose tolerance study in the nasal epithelium, we tested the safety and efficacy of a cationic liposome [p-ethyl-dimyristoylphosphadityl choline (EDMPC) cholesterol] complexed with an expression plasmid containing hCFTR cDNA. Eleven adult CF patients were studied in a protocol that allowed comparisons within individual subjects: vector and placebo were sprayed into alternate nostrils at intervals over 7 h. After dosing, vector-specific DNA was present in nasal ravage of all subjects for up to 10 days. There were no adverse events. The vector-treated epithelium did not exhibit a significant increase in CFTR-mediated Cl- conductance from baseline and was not different from the placebo-treated nostril: mean Delta CFTR Cl- conductance, mV +/- SEM, -1.6 +/- 0.4 vs -0.6 +/- 0.4 respectively. CFTR-mediated Cl- conductance increased toward normal during repetitive nasal potential difference measurements over the 3 days before dosing which influenced the postdosing calculations. No vector-specific mRNA was detected in the nasal epithelial scrape biopsies, although endogenous CFTR mRNA was detected in all subjects. We conclude that the lipid-DNA complex is safe, but did not produce consistent evidence of gene transfer to the nasal epithelium by physiologic or molecular measures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available