3.8 Article

Protective effect of estrogens against oxidative damage to heart and skeletal muscle in vivo and in vitro

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1373.2000.22308.x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIAAA NIH HHS [T32 AA07561] Funding Source: Medline
  2. PHS HHS [P01-A610485] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON ALCOHOL ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM [T32AA007561] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Estrogen has been shown to protect skeletal muscle from damage and to exert antioxidant properties. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the antioxidant and protective properties of estrogens in rodent cardiac and skeletal muscle and H9c2 cells. Female Sprague-Dawley rats were separated into three groups, ovariectomized (OVX), ovariectomized with estrogen replacement (OVX + E2), and intact control (SHAM), and were assessed at two time periods, 4 and 8 weeks. Rodents hearts were analyzed for basal and iron-stimulated lipid peroxidation in the absence and presence of beta-estradiol (beta E2) by measuring thiobarbituric acid reactive species (TBARS), Isolated soleus (SOL) and extensor digitorum longus (EDL) were analyzed for creatine kinase (CK) efflux, Using H9c2 cells, the in vitro effects of beta E2 and its isomer alpha-estradiol were investigated under glucose-free/hypoxic conditions. TBARS assay was also performed on the H9c2 in the presence or absence of beta E2, The results indicate that OVX rodent hearts are more susceptible to lipid peroxidation than OVX + E2 hearts. OVX soleus showed higher cumulative efflux of CK than OVX + E2, Furthermore, H9c2 survival during oxidative stress was enhanced when estrogen was present, and both OVX hearts at 4 weeks and H9c2 cells particularly were protected from oxidative damage by estrogens. We conclude that estrogen protects both skeletal and cardiac muscle from damage, and its antioxidant activity can contribute to this protection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available