4.5 Article

Fundamental studies on contrast images from different-sized microbubbles: Analytical and experimental studies

Journal

ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages 81-91

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0301-5629(99)00107-6

Keywords

ultrasound contrast agent; microbubbles; sodium laurate; fractionation; multiple scattering effect; acoustic shadowing effect; tissue-mimicking phantoms

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microbubbles are very useful as ultrasound (US) contrast:agents because of their excellent scattering properties. Because microbubbles of different sizes can be used for this purpose, the contrast images produced by different-sized microbubbles are studied in this paper. The contrast images from microbubbles of average sizes 35.5 mu m and 2.1 mu m were investigated experimentally. Although a low concentration of microbubbles produces contrast-enhanced images without artefacts, an excess of microbubbles results in distorted images. From experimental observation, the distortion of an image caused:by microbubbles of average size 35.5 mu m was mainly due to multiple scattering, and that by 2.1-mu m microbubbles was due to the acoustic shadowing effect. With the use of the tissue-mimicking phantoms of known acoustical properties, the brightness of the contrast images from the microbubble suspension was calculated. The calculated and experimental results of the contrast images produced from microbubbles of average size 35.5 mu m were closer to each other when there was no image distortion. When image distortion caused by multiple-scattering occurred, the experimental pixel brightness was higher, For smaller microbubbles of average size 2.1 mu m, calculated results of free microbubbles showed a weaker contrast effect than the experimental results. By taking the effect of the coatings of microbubbles into consideration, the calculated brightness of contrast images became much closer to the experimental one. (C) 2000 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available