4.4 Article

Retinal pigment epithelial autotransplantation: morphological changes in retina and choroid

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER-VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s004170000132

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NEI NIH HHS [P01-EY01765] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE [P30EY001765] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Replacment of degenerating retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells has been proposed to promote photoreceptor survival in retinal pigment epithelial disease. However, allografts of RPE have a higher rate of immunological rejection. The investigators studied the effects of autotransplantation of RPE on the morphological changes in photoreceptors and choriocapillaris. Methods: RPE autotransplantation (wound type 1) was performed in 25 rabbits and compared with wounds following debridement of the RPE (wound type 2). Light and electron microscopy and scanning electron microscopy of choroidal vascular casts were performed at 3, 7, 13 and 30 days after surgery. Quantitative analysis of the choriocapillaris bed area was performed by automated image analysis and the results were analyzed by paired Student's t-test. Results: Retinal pigment epithelium was found to be monolayered and ill-differentiated at day 7. Differentiation occurred at day 30, with preservation of photoreceptors and other layers of the neurosensory retina in type 1 wounds. Type 2 wounds showed atrophy of the regenerating retinal pigment epithelium at day 14 and day 30 with loss of overlying photoreceptor cell layer. There was significant choriocapillaris regeneration in type 1 wounds compared to the type 2 wounds at day 7 (P = 0.045), day 14 (P = 0.028) & day 30 (P = 0.06). Conclusions: Retinal pigment epithelial autotransplantation significantly reduced photoreceptor degeneration and choriocapillaris atrophy associated with loss of retinal pigment epithelium. This procedure supports the hypothesis that RPE autotransplantation may be helpful in geographic atrophy and conditions requiring submacular surgery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available